by E. Perez & s. Hughes 12/15/2011 p. A6
"President Barack Obama withdrew his threat to veto a Pentagon-funding bill that increases military authority over terrorism detainees..."
Majia here: See here for my discussion of the original version of the bill: http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2011/11/aclu-letter-challenges-defense-bill.html
The WSJ article explains that revisions to the bill include waiver rights afforded to the US President, allowing him/her to decide in case-by-case fashion whether the military or the civilian justice system should take the lead in terrorism investigations. The bill appears to allow the President to delegate this authority.
It appears from both the WSJ and Washington Post accounts of changes to the bill that the basic problem of habeas corpus remains unresolved.
The WSJ article quotes Laura Pitter, counterterrorism adviser to Human Rights Watch: "From a legacy perspective, he's basically the first president in history to authorize indefinite detention without trail in the United States of America."
Likewise, The Washington Post account includes a quote from the ACLU:
[Excerpted] "Human
rights and civil liberties groups, which have said that the bill would
allow for the indefinite detention of American citizens, on Wednesday
urged President Obama not to approve the measure. Laura W. Murphy,
director of the ACLU’s Washington Legislative Office, said in a
statement that if Obama signs the measure, “it will damage both his
legacy and America’s reputation for upholding the rule of law.”
“The
last time Congress passed indefinite detention legislation was during
the McCarthy era and President Truman had the courage to veto that
bill,” Murphy said. “We hope that the president will consider the long
view of history before codifying indefinite detention without charge or
trial.” [end quoted passage]
See here for ACLU's reaction to the first version of this bill
http://www.aclu.org/files/assets/aclu_letter_to_sjc_on_ndaa.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.